Korea vs Singapore: Even with Corporate Law Reform, Retail Investors Still Struggle

A recent article from The Straits Times highlighted how retail investors in Singapore are struggling to enforce their rights in a system that lacks collective legal support. But this problem isn’t exclusive to Singapore.

"Isn't this exactly what’s happening to us in Korea too?"

🇰🇷 Korea Faces Similar Challenges

South Korea is currently undergoing heated debate over corporate law reform. Some of the key issues include:

Introduction of multi-derivative lawsuits
Separate election of audit committee members
Mandatory electronic voting

While these reforms appear to enhance transparency and protect minority shareholders, in reality, they reflect a deeper power struggle between large corporations, the government, and individual investors.

📊 Same Goal, Different Paths

Aspect	Singapore 🇸🇬	Korea 🇰🇷
Main Issue	Lack of class-action mechanisms	Controversial legal reforms
Institutional Response	SIAS-led soft pressure	Legislation-driven enforcement
Drawbacks	High legal costs, weak access to justice	Corporate backlash, weak execution
Common Ground	Retail investors face practical barriers to exercising their rights

⚖️ From Rights on Paper to Rights in Practice

It’s not just about granting legal rights. The real question is whether investors can actually use them.

It’s not enough to give rights on paper. What we need is access to those rights.

🧠 What Should We Be Thinking About?

Introducing collective legal action mechanisms
Reducing legal costs and improving investor education
Ensuring policies are not just symbolic but actionable

✅ Conclusion

Whether it’s Korea or Singapore, true reform happens only when retail investors gain practical power. Changing the law is just the beginning — what matters is who benefits from those changes.

Real reform doesn’t live on paper,
it begins in the hands of those who can act on it.